DISQUS

Nicholas · 1 year ago

What I liked is that they did the movie titles like they were doing TV show titles. It fit perfectly, if you ask me.

Nicholas · 1 year ago

What I liked is that they did the movie titles like they were doing TV show titles. It fit perfectly, if you ask me.

Steve · 1 year ago

This is better than the movie that it precedes. This is how it should have been done for all the other ones. The music is good, the editing spot on, and the fonts are great. In this one they strayed too far from the formula, MI II was a bad John Woo movie and MI III was Alias with Tom Cruise as Sydney Bristow. Speaking of Alias, how about those titles, anyone, anyone?

Steve · 1 year ago

This is better than the movie that it precedes. This is how it should have been done for all the other ones. The music is good, the editing spot on, and the fonts are great. In this one they strayed too far from the formula, MI II was a bad John Woo movie and MI III was Alias with Tom Cruise as Sydney Bristow. Speaking of Alias, how about those titles, anyone, anyone?

Freon Bingo · 1 year ago

Typical of Brian DePalma: stylish and cheeky. The entire plot is told in the opening credits. Brilliant!

Freon Bingo · 1 year ago

Typical of Brian DePalma: stylish and cheeky. The entire plot is told in the opening credits. Brilliant!

Mark · 1 year ago

Excellent titles. They were done in perfect Mission: Impossible style. (Shame about the movie.)

Mark · 1 year ago

Excellent titles. They were done in perfect Mission: Impossible style. (Shame about the movie.)

Ryan · 1 year ago

I agree that too much is given away in these title although it is stylish

Ryan · 1 year ago

I agree that too much is given away in these title although it is stylish